Skip to content

VolumeMount path restriction bypass via missing filepath.Clean in /tekton/ check

Moderate
vdemeester published GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858 Apr 21, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/tektoncd/pipeline (Go)

Affected versions

<= 1.10.0

Patched versions

1.0.2, 1.3.4, 1.6.2, 1.9.3, 1.11.1

Description

Summary

A validation bypass in the VolumeMount path restriction allows mounting
volumes under restricted /tekton/ internal paths by using .. path
traversal components. The restriction check uses strings.HasPrefix
without filepath.Clean, so a path like /tekton/home/../results
passes validation but resolves to /tekton/results at runtime.

Details

Tekton Pipelines restricts VolumeMount paths under /tekton/ (except
/tekton/home) to prevent users from interfering with internal
execution state. The validation at
pkg/apis/pipeline/v1/container_validation.go checks mount paths using
strings.HasPrefix without normalizing the path first:

if strings.HasPrefix(vm.MountPath, "/tekton/") &&
    !strings.HasPrefix(vm.MountPath, "/tekton/home") {
    // reject
}

Because /tekton/home is an allowed prefix, a path like
/tekton/home/../results passes both checks. At runtime, the container
runtime resolves .. and the actual mount point becomes
/tekton/results.

The same pattern exists in pkg/apis/pipeline/v1beta1/task_validation.go.

Impact

An authenticated user with Task or TaskRun creation permissions can
mount volumes over internal Tekton paths, potentially:

  • Writing fake task results that downstream pipelines trust
  • Reading or modifying step scripts before execution
  • Interfering with entrypoint coordination state

Patches

(to be filled: fixed in versions X.Y.Z)

Workarounds

  • Use admission controllers (OPA/Gatekeeper, Kyverno) to validate that
    VolumeMount paths do not contain .. components.
  • In multi-tenant setups, restrict who can create Task and TaskRun
    resources via RBAC.

Affected Versions

All versions through v1.10.0 (both v1 and v1beta1 APIs).

Acknowledgments

This vulnerability was reported by @kodareef5.

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-40923

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits