Skip to content

[Documentation] Add DeepWiki badge to README#1271

Open
Medenor wants to merge 1 commit intortk-ai:developfrom
Medenor:patch-2
Open

[Documentation] Add DeepWiki badge to README#1271
Medenor wants to merge 1 commit intortk-ai:developfrom
Medenor:patch-2

Conversation

@Medenor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Medenor Medenor commented Apr 13, 2026

@pszymkowiak pszymkowiak added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation effort-small Quelques heures, 1 fichier good first issue Good for newcomers labels Apr 13, 2026
@pszymkowiak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[w] wshm · Automated triage by AI

📊 Automated PR Analysis

📝 Type docs
🟢 Risk low

Summary

Adds a DeepWiki badge to the README.md file, linking to the DeepWiki page for the rtk-ai/rtk project. This is a minor documentation-only change adding one line to the existing badge section.

Review Checklist

  • Tests present
  • Breaking change
  • Docs updated

Analyzed automatically by wshm · This is an automated analysis, not a human review.

@aeppling
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

aeppling commented Apr 14, 2026

Hey @Medenor , didn't know about deepwiki, really nice !

For me it is quick gains i'm for it

Thanks for contributing

@aeppling aeppling self-assigned this Apr 14, 2026
@aeppling
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

aeppling commented Apr 14, 2026

wrong branch target :) will need to pass by develop as other PRs

@Medenor Medenor changed the base branch from master to develop April 14, 2026 19:25
@Medenor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Medenor commented Apr 14, 2026

Done and you're welcome 👌🏻

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aeppling aeppling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking deeper in docs there is some non accurate technical parts, it complete our docs but with some inaccuracies, waiting for another maintainer thoughts about it

@aeppling
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for rectifying the target

@aeppling aeppling requested a review from pszymkowiak April 14, 2026 20:04
@Medenor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Medenor commented Apr 14, 2026

Looking deeper in docs there is some non accurate technical parts, it complete our docs but with some inaccuracies, waiting for another maintainer thoughts about it

Yes, it’s likely the scan was performed a few days ago, and changes have been added to the repository since then. I’m not entirely sure how the periodic scanning works, but I do know that after some time, we can trigger a manual rescan by entering the repository URL.

Plus, from my understanding this is AI-produced (I used to use the FOSS equivalent, DeepWiki-Open), so accuracies remain clearly possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation effort-small Quelques heures, 1 fichier good first issue Good for newcomers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants