chore: add missing entries to the path filter of GitHub actions

[yocaba]

What

Add missing entries to the path filter of GitHub actions

Why

To execute the GitHub actions whenever something related has been changed.

Testing

none

Checklist

• Tests added/updated n/a
• No breaking changes (or upgrade path documented above)
• Readable commit history (squashed and cleaned up as desired)
• AI code review considered and comments resolved

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated CI triggers so lint and validation checks run when lint configuration or chart-related files change.
  • Adjusted Helm lint workflows to run on the main development branches with relevant path filters.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two CI workflow files receive additional path filter entries. golang.yaml adds .golangci.yml to both push and pull_request triggers. helm-lint.yaml adds .github/workflows/helm-lint.yaml to both triggers alongside the existing charts/** filter.

Changes

CI Workflow Trigger Updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Workflow path filter additions .github/workflows/golang.yaml, .github/workflows/helm-lint.yaml	golang.yaml adds .golangci.yml to push and pull_request path filters; helm-lint.yaml adds its own workflow file path to both push and pull_request path filters.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• opendefensecloud/artifact-conduit#321: Modifies the same golang.yaml workflow by extending push/pull_request path filters, directly overlapping with the trigger changes in this PR.

Poem

🐇 A bunny checks the lint configs with glee,
Now workflows wake when .golangci shifts free.
Helm charts and workflow files join the watch list too,
No sneaky CI gap shall ever slip through!
Hop hop, the paths are set — all triggers true! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main change: updating GitHub Actions path filters.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description matches the template's core sections and states the change, rationale, testing, and checklist, with only optional fields omitted.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/github-action-triggers

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coveralls]

Coverage Report for CI Build 28440102786

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 84.052%

Details

• Coverage increased (+0.2%) from the base build.
• Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
• 2 coverage regressions across 1 file.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

2 previously-covered lines in 1 file lost coverage.

File	Lines Losing Coverage	Coverage
pkg/controller/workflow_handler.go	2	83.18%

---

Coverage Stats

Relevant Lines:	928
Covered Lines:	780
Line Coverage:	84.05%
Coverage Strength:	1293.0 hits per line

---

💛 - Coveralls

[yocaba]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[cbrgm]

LGTM