feat: Lemmas related to evaluating indices of tensors#1292
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude <claude@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <claude@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thank you for this PR, which will now be reviewed. If submitting to ./Physlib or ./QuantumInfo, please see our review guidelines if you are not familiar with the process. You should expect a back and forth with a reviewer before your PR is merged. See also that link for how to add appropriate labels to your PR. The PR will also go through a number of automated checks. You can learn more about these here, including how to run them locally. If you are submitting to ./PhyslibAlpha there will be a lighter review process, though your PR must still pass the automated checks. If you want to bring attention to this PR, please write a message on this thread of the Lean Zulip. Important: If a reviewer adds an |
zhikaip
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is it possible to add more documentation to explain what evalT permT etc. are doing? I understand this is part of a larger refactor and maybe you want to do it at the end, so I've approved this for now
Co-Authored-By: Claude <claude@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@zhikaip Made enough changes that this probably need another review before merging. |
|
Going to merge this now. |
Added lemmas related to the evaluation of indices of tensors.
Claude used for part of the proofs.