Create SECURITY.md - #1927
Conversation
WalkthroughA new ChangesSecurity Policy Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Around line 15-21: The "Reporting a Vulnerability" section in SECURITY.md
currently contains only generic template instructions instead of an actual
security vulnerability reporting policy. Replace this placeholder text with
specific, actionable information that includes: the exact method and contact
point for reporting vulnerabilities (e.g., email address, form URL, or GitHub
security advisory process), the expected response timeframe, what the reporter
can expect if their vulnerability is accepted or rejected, whether public
disclosure is allowed and under what conditions, and any service level
agreements or commitments your team is making regarding vulnerability handling.
- Around line 5-6: The SECURITY.md file contains placeholder instructional text
from the GitHub template rather than actual content describing your project's
security update support policy. Replace the placeholder text in the "Supported
Versions" section with real, specific information about which versions of your
project currently receive security updates, including details about your version
support strategy and the rationale for which versions are maintained. Remove all
template instructions and provide concrete details that users can rely on to
understand the security support lifecycle of different versions.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
| Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are | ||
| currently being supported with security updates. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Huh? You just copy-pasted the GitHub template without actually filling it in~? (´△`)♡
Lines 5-6 are literally instructional placeholder text telling people to "use this section to tell people..." This isn't a real security policy, you lazy goose~! You gotta actually describe which versions are really getting security updates and why. Don't just leave template comments in there, geez (´・ω・`)
Replace this with actual, specific information about your version support strategy♡
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 5 - 6, The SECURITY.md file contains placeholder
instructional text from the GitHub template rather than actual content
describing your project's security update support policy. Replace the
placeholder text in the "Supported Versions" section with real, specific
information about which versions of your project currently receive security
updates, including details about your version support strategy and the rationale
for which versions are maintained. Remove all template instructions and provide
concrete details that users can rely on to understand the security support
lifecycle of different versions.
| ## Reporting a Vulnerability | ||
|
|
||
| Use this section to tell people how to report a vulnerability. | ||
|
|
||
| Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a | ||
| reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or | ||
| declined, etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This vulnerability reporting section is, like, completely empty~ (´・ω・`) ♡ ♡
You've just left template instructions here instead of actual policy, and that's kinda careless, don't ya think~? Security researchers have no idea:
- WHERE to report (email? form? GitHub security advisory?)
- WHEN to expect a response (24 hours? 1 week? never? (´△`))
- WHAT happens if the vuln is accepted vs rejected
- Whether to disclose publicly or keep it private
- Any commitments or SLAs you're making
Just leaving vague template text here isn't a real security policy~ Fill in actual details before shipping this, okay? (´；ω；`)♡
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 15 - 21, The "Reporting a Vulnerability" section in
SECURITY.md currently contains only generic template instructions instead of an
actual security vulnerability reporting policy. Replace this placeholder text
with specific, actionable information that includes: the exact method and
contact point for reporting vulnerabilities (e.g., email address, form URL, or
GitHub security advisory process), the expected response timeframe, what the
reporter can expect if their vulnerability is accepted or rejected, whether
public disclosure is allowed and under what conditions, and any service level
agreements or commitments your team is making regarding vulnerability handling.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit