Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
Pardon my ignorance, as I don't know a lot about epmd. There are also |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #552
#339 already did most of this, but missed two places where we would still try to use the default epmd daemon:
:erl_epmd.register_nodemakes the node join the epmd cluster, which has proven to cause issues with our custom setup. I don't fully understand the mechanism, but the observed effect is that project nodes can't connect to the manager node nor with eachother.:erl_epmd.port_pleasecall. It should not be reached and it does not make the current node join the epmd cluster, but it still tries to reach the epmd daemon and I think that should be avoided as much as possibleThat said, it's been a long time since I've been able to reproduce that error, and I couldn't do it so far today. I think the issue is being connected to EPMD based on my previous experience with that kind of trace. It's that, and the fact that expert is still connecting to epmd when it should not: