Skip to content

Repository files navigation

RIME

Representation-Induced Mechanics and Evolution

RIME studies spectral, transport, accessibility, and deformation structures in finite-dimensional represented systems. The Rubik cube is used as a concrete finite representation laboratory, not as a puzzle-solving problem.

Public Release

The current public release contains Papers I--XIV. CCS v2 is published separately as an optional non-paper Computational Companion Archive; the immutable first combined record retains its historical predecessor.

Component Topic DOI / source
Paper I block spectral structure and a conditional rationality criterion https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21571403
Paper II sector non-invariance, direct support, and transport channels https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21581072
Paper III support-graph reachability and matrix-composition obstructions https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21583070
Paper IV collision geometry of joint spectra https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21972335
Paper V Boolean support and commutator accessibility https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21634007
Paper VI linearized commutativity geometry, normality gates, and typed spectral registrations https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21973224
Paper VII incidence geometry, rank protection, and composition-promotion limits https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21976516
Paper VIII sectorized observable framework https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21977464
Paper IX observable dynamics of sectorized observable frameworks https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21713306
Paper X capability-aware compilation for Sectorized Observable Frameworks and Registry evidence https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21768257
Paper XI typed wall morphology for Sectorized Observable Frameworks https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21801722
Paper XII SOF diagnostic protocol and report specification https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21870368
Paper XIII Audit Profiles, SOF Report Alignment, and sparse typed comparison maps https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21870778
Paper XIV context- and policy-relative interpretation and bounded candidate dispositions https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21880943
CCS v2 optional reproducibility, observation, open-problem, and history archive https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21616956
Historical combined Papers I--III + CCS release immutable first-version archive; current papers are maintained independently https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21108197

This is the repository's canonical DOI index. It identifies immutable published records; other public documents link here instead of duplicating the list. Papers VII--XIV now match their published versioned records. Their listed DOIs identify immutable published versions, and frozen historical contracts remain unchanged.

Start Here

If you want to... Start with
browse the public documentation docs/README.md
get the program overview docs/overview.md
understand the paper architecture docs/PROGRAM_MAP.md
understand the Rubik-as-laboratory philosophy docs/PROGRAM_PHILOSOPHY.md
check paper boundaries docs/PAPER_SCOPE.md
inspect canonical Rubik invariants docs/CORE_INVARIANTS.md
check geometry and move conventions docs/conventions.md
inspect reproducibility scripts experiments/README.md
inspect published SOF data contracts schemas/README.md
run domain adapters, plugins, and capability-aware compilation sof-runtime
inspect optional reproducibility data, observations, open problems, and history ccs/canonical_specification.md

Papers

Paper PDF Source Main question
I paper1_arxiv.pdf Paper I.md What is the blockwise canonical spectrum, and which conditional arithmetic criteria apply?
II paper2_arxiv.pdf Paper II.md Why does the nine-sector transport graph have its observed sparse structure?
III paper3_arxiv.pdf Paper III.md When does a path in the direct support graph represent a nonzero projected matrix composition?
IV paper4_arxiv.pdf Paper IV.md How do fixed affine-branch collisions form quotient layers, and when may a numerical realization inherit that quotient?
V paper5_arxiv.pdf Paper V.md Why does Boolean support fail to determine commutator accessibility?
VI paper6_arxiv.pdf Paper VI.md Which linearized directions preserve the constraints, and which samples pass the spectral gates?
VII paper7_arxiv.pdf Paper VII.md When do nonzero projected factors compose, and what limits stronger promotions?
VIII paper8_arxiv.pdf Paper VIII.md What is the marked static sectorized observable object?
IX paper9_arxiv.pdf Paper IX.md How do comparable typed SOF fields evolve under a declared deformation?
X paper10_arxiv.pdf Paper X.md Under which contracts can typed claims be compiled without manufacturing evidence or crossing carriers?
XI paper11_arxiv.pdf Paper XI.md How can admitted wall data be recorded as sparse typed changes and organized by profile-relative morphology?
XII paper12_arxiv.pdf Paper XII.md What does a compiled report represent, and where do adapter adequacy and reporting authority end?
XIII paper13_arxiv.pdf Paper XIII.md How can two SOF Reports be aligned and compared without conflating difference with defect?
XIV paper14_arxiv.pdf Paper XIV.md How can an immutable audit be interpreted under admitted context and policy without promoting candidates into decisions or effects?
CCS v2 Archive ccs_arxiv.pdf canonical_specification.md Optional Paper I--III reproducibility pointers, computational observations, open problems, and historical records

Thematic index, not a paper dependency order:

Arithmetic
Transport
Support-graph/matrix-composition separation
Collision geometry
Local support and commutator separation
Linearized commutativity and normality-gated registration
Incidence geometry and promotion limits
SOF object theory
Observable dynamics
Capability-aware compilation for Sectorized Observable Frameworks and Registry evidence
Typed wall morphology and multi-label taxonomy
SOF diagnostic reporting
SOF Report Alignment and comparison geometry
Context- and policy-relative interpretation and bounded candidate semantics

Papers I--VII are independently readable. Their neighboring results connect through typed inputs and outputs; every receiving paper restates its objects, hypotheses, and missing promotion conditions.

Repository Structure

rime-lite/
|-- rime/                 core representation and spectral computation
|-- experiments/          paper support scripts and diagnostics
|-- tests/                invariant checks
|-- papers/               manuscript sources
|-- ccs/                  Computational Companion and Status Archive source
|-- docs/                 public overview, program map, and companion notes
|-- schemas/              versioned SOFRS, SOFAUDIT, SOFAction, and Registry contracts
|-- registry/             immutable v1 and frozen typed v2 Registry snapshots
`-- figures/              manuscript figures and presentation-only renderers

Runtime and Application Boundary

This repository is the normative source for papers, mathematical objects, theorems, versioned contracts, accepted evidence, and publication identities. The separate sof-runtime repository provides the Python reference runtime, domain adapters, execution plugins, evidence generation, compiler operation, and application examples.

Runtime protocol conformance or a passing extension validator does not by itself add a carrier, theorem, claim status, or public result to RIME. Stable extensions return here as source-addressed promotion proposals; accepted semantics are versioned here before the runtime refreshes its upstream lock. Existing paper-local experiments remain with their owning releases.

Reproducibility

Install the package in editable mode:

pip install -e .

Run fast invariant checks:

python tests/run_all_tests.py

Representative support scripts:

python experiments/paper1/validation/spectral_ladder.py
python experiments/paper2/validation/primitive_sectors.py
python experiments/paper3/validation/composition_obstruction.py
python experiments/paper4/validation/rubik_collision_quotient.py
python experiments/paper5/validation/matrix_nondegeneracy.py
python experiments/paper6/validation/tangent_commutator_map.py
python experiments/paper7/validation/rank_protected_bridge_audit.py
python experiments/paper9/validation/validate_results.py
python experiments/paper10/validation/validate_results.py
python experiments/paper11/validation/typed_wall_record_census.py
python experiments/paper12/validation/validate_sofrs_v2.py
python experiments/paper13/validation/validate_sofaudit_v2.py
python experiments/paper14/action_workbench.py
python experiments/paper14/validate_sofaction.py

For the full experiment map, see experiments/README.md.

Scope

This is not a cube-solving repository. It does not implement Kociemba's algorithm, pruning tables, scramble search, sticker rendering, or neural solvers. The cube is used as a finite representation-theoretic testbed.

Acknowledgements

Repository maintenance and editorial workflows have used ChatGPT/Codex, Claude, and Gemini/Continue for bounded assistance with code, document restructuring, language suggestions, and consistency review. These tools are not authors or authorities on mathematical claims. All mathematical judgments, accepted edits, verification choices, releases, and scholarly responsibility remain with WuJun Chen.

License

Code: MIT License. See LICENSE.

Papers and manuscript sources: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). See LICENSE-PAPERS.

Citation

Please cite the individual paper DOI when referring to a specific result. Use the canonical DOI index above to select the immutable record. Cite CCS v2 only for archive-specific material, and cite the historical combined record only when referring to that immutable first-version package.

About

RIME: spectral, transport, accessibility, and observable-pipeline geometry for finite represented systems, with Rubik as a reproducible laboratory.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages