ffe: test that SDKs ignore unknown fields and condition operators#6820
ffe: test that SDKs ignore unknown fields and condition operators#6820dd-oleksii merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
|
|
🎉 All green!❄️ No new flaky tests detected 🔗 Commit SHA: 9b9a464 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback! |
19d1018 to
bf7a51f
Compare
typotter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looking good!
TIL: G.R.E.A.S.E.
thanks for making our code greasy
| tests/docker_ssi/test_docker_ssi_appsec.py::TestDockerSSIAppsecFeatures::test_telemetry_source_ssi: v3.36.0 | ||
| tests/ffe/test_dynamic_evaluation.py: v3.36.0 | ||
| tests/ffe/test_dynamic_evaluation.py::Test_FFE_Flag_Parse_Error_Isolation: bug (FFL-2184) | ||
| tests/ffe/test_dynamic_evaluation.py::Test_FFE_Unknown_Operator_Tolerance: bug (FFL-2184) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FFL-2182 is for making unknown operator an error. FFL-2184 is for isolating errors on flag level.
.NET SDK already fails to parse unknown operators, so that part (FFL-2182) is good. But it does not isolate errors to flags, so FFL-2184 is correct here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bf7a51f145
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
sameerank
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No manifest updates for python and ruby means they already handle unknown fields & conditions correctly, right?
|
@sameerank yes! |
Motivation
Changes
Workflow
🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!
🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟
Reviewer checklist
tests/ormanifests/is modified ? I have the approval from R&P teambuild-XXX-imagelabel is present