1515from ...utils .coerce import as_int as _as_int
1616from ...utils .coerce import as_mapping as _as_mapping
1717from ...utils .coerce import as_sequence as _as_sequence
18+ from ..messages import gates as gate_msgs
1819
1920if TYPE_CHECKING :
2021 from ...models import CoverageJoinResult , ProjectMetrics
@@ -271,9 +272,9 @@ def _complexity_threshold_reason(
271272) -> tuple [str , ...]:
272273 return _reason_if (
273274 0 <= config .fail_complexity < state .complexity_max ,
274- "Complexity threshold exceeded: "
275- f"max CC={ state .complexity_max } , "
276- f"threshold={ config .fail_complexity } ." ,
275+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_COMPLEXITY_THRESHOLD
276+ + f"max CC={ state .complexity_max } , "
277+ + f"threshold={ config .fail_complexity } ." ,
277278 )
278279
279280
@@ -284,9 +285,9 @@ def _coupling_threshold_reason(
284285) -> tuple [str , ...]:
285286 return _reason_if (
286287 0 <= config .fail_coupling < state .coupling_max ,
287- "Coupling threshold exceeded: "
288- f"max CBO={ state .coupling_max } , "
289- f"threshold={ config .fail_coupling } ." ,
288+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_COUPLING_THRESHOLD
289+ + f"max CBO={ state .coupling_max } , "
290+ + f"threshold={ config .fail_coupling } ." ,
290291 )
291292
292293
@@ -297,9 +298,9 @@ def _cohesion_threshold_reason(
297298) -> tuple [str , ...]:
298299 return _reason_if (
299300 0 <= config .fail_cohesion < state .cohesion_max ,
300- "Cohesion threshold exceeded: "
301- f"max LCOM4={ state .cohesion_max } , "
302- f"threshold={ config .fail_cohesion } ." ,
301+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_COHESION_THRESHOLD
302+ + f"max LCOM4={ state .cohesion_max } , "
303+ + f"threshold={ config .fail_cohesion } ." ,
303304 )
304305
305306
@@ -310,8 +311,8 @@ def _health_threshold_reason(
310311) -> tuple [str , ...]:
311312 return _reason_if (
312313 config .fail_health >= 0 and state .health_score < config .fail_health ,
313- "Health score below threshold: "
314- f"score={ state .health_score } , threshold={ config .fail_health } ." ,
314+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_HEALTH_THRESHOLD
315+ + f"score={ state .health_score } , threshold={ config .fail_health } ." ,
315316 )
316317
317318
@@ -322,7 +323,7 @@ def _dependency_cycles_reason(
322323) -> tuple [str , ...]:
323324 return _reason_if (
324325 config .fail_cycles and state .dependency_cycles > 0 ,
325- f"Dependency cycles detected: { state .dependency_cycles } cycle(s) ." ,
326+ f"{ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_CYCLES_DETECTED } { state .dependency_cycles } { gate_msgs . GATE_SUFFIX_CYCLES } ." ,
326327 )
327328
328329
@@ -333,7 +334,7 @@ def _dead_code_high_confidence_reason(
333334) -> tuple [str , ...]:
334335 return _reason_if (
335336 config .fail_dead_code and state .dead_high_confidence > 0 ,
336- f"Dead code detected (high confidence): { state .dead_high_confidence } item(s) ." ,
337+ f"{ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_DEAD_CODE_DETECTED } { state .dead_high_confidence } { gate_msgs . GATE_SUFFIX_ITEMS } ." ,
337338 )
338339
339340
@@ -344,8 +345,7 @@ def _new_high_risk_functions_reason(
344345) -> tuple [str , ...]:
345346 return _reason_if (
346347 config .fail_on_new_metrics and state .diff_new_high_risk_functions > 0 ,
347- "New high-risk functions vs metrics baseline: "
348- f"{ state .diff_new_high_risk_functions } ." ,
348+ f"{ gate_msgs .GATE_REASON_NEW_HIGH_RISK_FUNCTIONS } { state .diff_new_high_risk_functions } ." ,
349349 )
350350
351351
@@ -356,8 +356,7 @@ def _new_high_coupling_classes_reason(
356356) -> tuple [str , ...]:
357357 return _reason_if (
358358 config .fail_on_new_metrics and state .diff_new_high_coupling_classes > 0 ,
359- "New high-coupling classes vs metrics baseline: "
360- f"{ state .diff_new_high_coupling_classes } ." ,
359+ f"{ gate_msgs .GATE_REASON_NEW_HIGH_COUPLING } { state .diff_new_high_coupling_classes } ." ,
361360 )
362361
363362
@@ -368,7 +367,7 @@ def _new_dependency_cycles_reason(
368367) -> tuple [str , ...]:
369368 return _reason_if (
370369 config .fail_on_new_metrics and state .diff_new_cycles > 0 ,
371- f"New dependency cycles vs metrics baseline: { state .diff_new_cycles } ." ,
370+ f"{ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_NEW_CYCLES } { state .diff_new_cycles } ." ,
372371 )
373372
374373
@@ -379,7 +378,7 @@ def _new_dead_code_reason(
379378) -> tuple [str , ...]:
380379 return _reason_if (
381380 config .fail_on_new_metrics and state .diff_new_dead_code > 0 ,
382- f"New dead code items vs metrics baseline: { state .diff_new_dead_code } ." ,
381+ f"{ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_NEW_DEAD_CODE } { state .diff_new_dead_code } ." ,
383382 )
384383
385384
@@ -390,7 +389,7 @@ def _health_regression_reason(
390389) -> tuple [str , ...]:
391390 return _reason_if (
392391 config .fail_on_new_metrics and state .diff_health_delta < 0 ,
393- f"Health score regressed vs metrics baseline: delta= { state .diff_health_delta } ." ,
392+ f"{ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_HEALTH_REGRESSION } { state .diff_health_delta } ." ,
394393 )
395394
396395
@@ -403,8 +402,8 @@ def _typing_coverage_threshold_reason(
403402 return _reason_if (
404403 config .min_typing_coverage >= 0
405404 and typing_percent < float (config .min_typing_coverage ),
406- "Typing coverage below threshold: "
407- f"coverage={ typing_percent :.1f} %, threshold={ config .min_typing_coverage } %." ,
405+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_TYPING_THRESHOLD
406+ + f"coverage={ typing_percent :.1f} %, threshold={ config .min_typing_coverage } %." ,
408407 )
409408
410409
@@ -417,9 +416,9 @@ def _docstring_coverage_threshold_reason(
417416 return _reason_if (
418417 config .min_docstring_coverage >= 0
419418 and docstring_percent < float (config .min_docstring_coverage ),
420- "Docstring coverage below threshold: "
421- f"coverage={ docstring_percent :.1f} %, "
422- f"threshold={ config .min_docstring_coverage } %." ,
419+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_DOCSTRING_THRESHOLD
420+ + f"coverage={ docstring_percent :.1f} %, "
421+ + f"threshold={ config .min_docstring_coverage } %." ,
423422 )
424423
425424
@@ -434,9 +433,9 @@ def _typing_regression_reason(
434433 state .diff_typing_param_permille_delta < 0
435434 or state .diff_typing_return_permille_delta < 0
436435 ),
437- "Typing coverage regressed vs metrics baseline: "
438- f"params_delta={ state .diff_typing_param_permille_delta } , "
439- f"returns_delta={ state .diff_typing_return_permille_delta } ." ,
436+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_TYPING_REGRESSION
437+ + f"params_delta={ state .diff_typing_param_permille_delta } , "
438+ + f"returns_delta={ state .diff_typing_return_permille_delta } ." ,
440439 )
441440
442441
@@ -447,8 +446,7 @@ def _docstring_regression_reason(
447446) -> tuple [str , ...]:
448447 return _reason_if (
449448 config .fail_on_docstring_regression and state .diff_docstring_permille_delta < 0 ,
450- "Docstring coverage regressed vs metrics baseline: "
451- f"delta={ state .diff_docstring_permille_delta } ." ,
449+ f"{ gate_msgs .GATE_REASON_DOCSTRING_REGRESSION } { state .diff_docstring_permille_delta } ." ,
452450 )
453451
454452
@@ -459,8 +457,7 @@ def _api_breaking_changes_reason(
459457) -> tuple [str , ...]:
460458 return _reason_if (
461459 config .fail_on_api_break and state .api_breaking_changes > 0 ,
462- "Public API breaking changes vs metrics baseline: "
463- f"{ state .api_breaking_changes } ." ,
460+ f"{ gate_msgs .GATE_REASON_API_BREAKING } { state .api_breaking_changes } ." ,
464461 )
465462
466463
@@ -473,9 +470,9 @@ def _coverage_hotspots_reason(
473470 config .fail_on_untested_hotspots
474471 and state .coverage_join_status == "ok"
475472 and state .coverage_hotspots > 0 ,
476- "Coverage hotspots detected: "
477- f"hotspots={ state .coverage_hotspots } , "
478- f"threshold={ config .coverage_min } %." ,
473+ gate_msgs . GATE_REASON_COVERAGE_HOTSPOTS
474+ + f"hotspots={ state .coverage_hotspots } , "
475+ + f"threshold={ config .coverage_min } %." ,
479476 )
480477
481478
0 commit comments