Support .nextest.toml config #3219
Closed
heroin-moose
started this conversation in
Feature requests
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Thanks for the request. This is a deliberate decision — all tools should be using .config to avoid cluttering the directory. (File bugs with those tools instead?) https://jrhawley.ca/2025/12/07/xdg-spec-for-repos Not supporting alternative paths is a way to make the .config style more widespread, so the incremental cost for the next tool to adopt it is that much lower. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Motivation
The situation with rust tooling is weird wrt to configuration file locations. We have a bunch of tools (cargo, rustfmt, clippy, nextest) and the configuration layout looks like this:
While clippy and rustfmt follow the usual convention, cargo and nextest use subdirs with contradicting approaches: cargo has it all for itself, while nextest creates XDG-like layout. The thing is that basically no other tool does that, leaving .config exclusively for nextest 99% of the time. It makes things confusing.
Proposal
Support having .nextest.toml as the last option for those of us who don't use any other tool that uses .config.
Alternatives
No response
Additional context
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions