Replies: 4 comments
-
|
I agree it would be easier if these were discussed as subgroups. What would be the best forum for this? Call, discussions, grouping issues, etc.? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can we also include categorical / ordinal types as its own group? Right now they're implemented as constraints / extensions on other types, but I think deserve first-class discussion. (relevant issue: #844) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
In my opinion, the most pressing issue for v2 is
fields:
-name: value
type: number
We get into an undefined state when we need to export data into e.g. SQL because |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
See also this comparison of SQL data types. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The Table Schema tag lists several issues related to data types. These might better be discussed together. Subgroups may be:
date and times
datetimewithformat=defaultsupport optional timezone offsets? #830numeric types
number.nanValues,number.infValues#644, Add decimal place constraint to number fields #641, bareNumber to interpret -$1000 as -1000 #609, SupportgroupCharforintegertype #498units
compound types
jsonfield type andjsonSchemaconstraint support #640table#410wktto field types #772, New propertycrs#812 (may be related to units)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions