GN003 seems incorrect

[sorawee]

The message for GN003 is "replacement strategy should not implement create_then_delete".

However, the check actually ensures that replacementStrategy is create_then_delete, and would fail if replacementStrategy is delete_then_create.

So the check and the message are inconsistent, and one of them (I'm not sure which one) should be fixed.

[ammokhov]

The message for GN003 is "replacement strategy should not implement create_then_delete".

However, the check actually ensures that replacementStrategy is create_then_delete, and would fail if replacementStrategy is delete_then_create.

So the check and the message are inconsistent, and one of them (I'm not sure which one) should be fixed.

This package uses guard v1 which uses defines what it should be and if otherwise produce a violation. So in other words check GN003 ensures that replacement strategy is create_then_delete otherwise fail

replacementStrategy == 'create_then_delete'