An observable created by reactivex.timer(1,5) will emit immediately when a second observer subscribes instead of waiting the "1" second specified as argument. This only happens when an interval value is specified
def test_timer_with_interval_repeat():
scheduler = TestScheduler()
source = reactivex.timer(10, 200, scheduler=scheduler)
result = scheduler.start(
lambda: source.pipe(
operators.take(2),
operators.repeat(),
)
)
assert result.messages == [
on_next(210, 0),
on_next(410, 1),
on_next(420, 0), # <- here it will actually emit at 410
on_next(620, 1), # then 610
on_next(630, 0), # and again at 610, missing the "10" ticks from the timer
on_next(830, 1), # etc...
on_next(840, 0),
]
Expected the timer to be "reset" regardless if we resub on repeat or with a second observer
Additional findings:
- it only happens when there is an interval value; non repeating timers don't have the issue
- using a
operators.delay we see that the next intervals follow the second subscription, meaning, they are correct relative to the first emission but wrong relative to expected behavior
reactivex.interval does not seem to have this issue
An observable created by
reactivex.timer(1,5)will emit immediately when a second observer subscribes instead of waiting the "1" second specified as argument. This only happens when an interval value is specifiedExpected the timer to be "reset" regardless if we resub on repeat or with a second observer
Additional findings:
operators.delaywe see that the next intervals follow the second subscription, meaning, they are correct relative to the first emission but wrong relative to expected behaviorreactivex.intervaldoes not seem to have this issue