Tracked under #6.
Scope
Today the wrapper exposes state.full(params, samples) only. The lower-level encode/decode flow — running the encoder once, then calling decode token-by-token with a custom sampler — is meaningful for research and custom-sampler use cases but doesn't fit whispery's pump architecture.
Symbols
whisper_encode, whisper_encode_with_state.whisper_decode, whisper_decode_with_state.whisper_get_logits, whisper_get_logits_from_state.whisper_set_mel, whisper_set_mel_with_state.whisper_pcm_to_mel, whisper_pcm_to_mel_with_state.
Why deferred
The full surface is large (≈10 functions plus the logits-reading patterns) and each adds an unsafe boundary that needs its own audit-axis coverage. The natural caller is someone building a custom sampler or a research harness — not yet on the table.
Acceptance
State::pcm_to_mel(&mut self, samples) / set_mel for explicit mel preparation.State::encode(&mut self, ...) for one-shot encode.State::decode(&mut self, tokens, ...) returning logits.State::logits() accessor.- All entry points covered by the safety-axis matrix in
safety_audit.rs.
- Tests on a poisoned fixture for input validation; integration tests for the round-trip on a small fixture model.
Probably wants a dedicated PR per major entry point given the audit overhead.
If you're building a custom sampler / research harness on top of whisper.cpp, drop a comment with your design.
Tracked under #6.
Scope
Today the wrapper exposes
state.full(params, samples)only. The lower-level encode/decode flow — running the encoder once, then callingdecodetoken-by-token with a custom sampler — is meaningful for research and custom-sampler use cases but doesn't fit whispery's pump architecture.Symbols
whisper_encode,whisper_encode_with_state.whisper_decode,whisper_decode_with_state.whisper_get_logits,whisper_get_logits_from_state.whisper_set_mel,whisper_set_mel_with_state.whisper_pcm_to_mel,whisper_pcm_to_mel_with_state.Why deferred
The full surface is large (≈10 functions plus the logits-reading patterns) and each adds an unsafe boundary that needs its own audit-axis coverage. The natural caller is someone building a custom sampler or a research harness — not yet on the table.
Acceptance
State::pcm_to_mel(&mut self, samples)/set_melfor explicit mel preparation.State::encode(&mut self, ...)for one-shot encode.State::decode(&mut self, tokens, ...)returning logits.State::logits()accessor.safety_audit.rs.Probably wants a dedicated PR per major entry point given the audit overhead.
If you're building a custom sampler / research harness on top of whisper.cpp, drop a comment with your design.